On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meest...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > I didn't quite understand how the current implementation would have BC > issues, though. Would you care to elaborate on that? > > > I didn't look at your actual implementation. I saw 3 constants and deduced that one would be required. If it was the case that there was a default to values then there is no BC, but it's cleaner to just have two constants here with the default behavior being values.
