Am 14.9.2013 um 23:21 schrieb Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com>: > Hi, > On Sep 14, 2013 10:56 AM, "Bob Weinand" <bobw...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 13.9.2013 um 16:18 schrieb Bob Weinand <bobw...@hotmail.com>: > > > What then would be still supported exactly is > > > with the restricted list: > > > - typehint > > > - class/trait/interface names > > > - goto-label > > > > > > unrestricted: > > > - method names > > > - constant names > > > - property names > > > - trait aliases > > > - declare list > > > (- argument names if we use identifier => $value syntax for named args) > > > > > > I think this is a good compromise. > > > > > > As promised I updated my patch. Think it is now less inconsistent. > > > > Are there still any issues now? > > > > Thanks for your work! > > Did you update the patch according to Johannes suggestions? > > I think we need a RFC for this non trivial change (from a user land point of > view and to change the engine). Do you know how to proceed to create one? >
If I didn't misunderstand Johannes, I have changed the patch to what he suggested. I will now proceed to write a RFC. Shouldn't be too complicated I think. If I'll encounter some problems, I'll come back here. Bob Weinand
