Hi! > I would not agree with your argument that it should be introduced because it > is requested by real people for years and it is simple to add. Isn't that > pretty much the same as "because we can"?
No, it is pretty much the opposite. It is "because people need it". > IMO we should wait with this RFC if Nikita is willing to write an RFC for > named parameters including an implementation afterwards, because I think We've been talking about it for years (last time here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namedparameters) but nothing happened. But I'm certainly willing to give it a chance, if it is happening. I just not want for all the effort to be wasted if it's not and we'd be left without a solution for a real problem again. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
