Hi Daniel, Thanks for the suggestion. Since it is less straight-forward I would rather just move forward with the current syntax. I'd hate to see the proposal rejected because people did not like the syntax.
Regards, Igor On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Daniel Bingham <daniel.bing...@ellislab.com> wrote: > Hey Igor, > > I love the RFC, but how about: > > use bar\baz() as baz; > > As an alternative to "use function". Still new syntax, but a little less > wordy. I have nothing for "use const", but "use const" feels more natural to > me than "use function" does. > > Just an idea for pondering! > > Dan > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote: > On 8 August 2013 14:29, Igor Wiedler <i...@wiedler.ch> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I just wanted to bump this topic, since there's not been much feedback > > during the last few weeks. Comments on the patch are also welcome. > > > > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use_function > > Patch: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/388 > > > > I like it. It improves the state for non-OOP in PHP. > > -- > Regards, > Mike > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
