Hi Stas, On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote:
> > Removing unneeded limitations, rather than forcing them to users, is user > > friendly and the way to go. IMHO. > > If we wrote it from scratch, sure. But if we already have existing and > working one, having people to deal with migrating data and > incompatibilities that arise IMHO is not worth the additional benefit of > having session variable named "!", without which one can live quite well. > So I'm not against having option for new serializer that does it if > somebody needs it, but I think changing the default for this and the > disruption potentially caused by it is not a very good idea. I agree. Breaking existing apps w/o good reason must be avoided. Therefore, I proposed that introduce new serializer for 5.5 as optional. Do you agree to have new serializer for 5.6 as optional and make it default for future releases? Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
