2013/7/23 Igor Wiedler <i...@wiedler.ch> > Hi Sebastian, > > The reason is precisely to avoid BC breaks, such as the one that you > quoted from the FAQ. > > Are you suggesting that such a BC break is acceptable for 5.6? >
I don't fear BCs and actually I prefer BCs against weak compromises. This depends on the weight of the BC ;) But aside: I am a regular user, not a core-dev or something. I just comment. > > As much as I dislike introducing new syntax, keeping BC was the reason I > did so. > > -- github.com/KingCrunch
