On 03.07.2013 20:05, Sanford Whiteman wrote: > a new keyword is problematic, perhaps this same >> behaviour could be enacted in cases where an inheriting class has a >> constructor and the base class' constructor is defined as final i.e. rather >> than causing an error, the final constructor is executed first, followed by
Most often if I need a super __construct(), I don't need it exactly before or exactly after the bottom constructor but at a specific point where I can setup super's input data and do stuff to its output. What is the typical use case for calling all supers (before or after the class' __construct itself) ? -- Ralf Lang Linux Consultant / Developer Tel.: +49-170-6381563 Mail: l...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
