On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, David Soria Parra <d...@php.net> wrote:
> On 2013-06-25, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > there were some initial discussion and work done on moving the docs to > git, > > see > > https://wiki.php.net/doc/git > > > http://git.php.net/?p=3Dweb/doc-editor.git;a=3Dshortlog;h=3Drefs/heads/GIT_= > > READY > > http://marc.info/?l=3Dphpdoc&m=3D132321958514090&w=3D2 > > > > but it seems that we lost momentum, but I think that this isn't a > technical > > problem, just lack of interest (svn and the online editor just works for > > the regulars), maybe others have different opinions on this. > > and I'm fairly certain that the slow integration of the patches also not > a > > technical problem as well. > > I think that it would worth more to figure out and fix the underlying > > problem which causes the current delay for integrating the incoming > patches= > > . > > moving to git/github without fixining the underlying issue would only > mean > > that we switched to pull requests not getting accepted in a timely > > manner(which is unfortunately common with our other git/github repos). > > generally speaking i am in favor in moving more and more to git. we lost > momentum > and I am stuck with a new job and RMing. I can help with technical > questions > but don't hav emuch time implementing it. > I'm also in favor of moving to Git. The amount of contributions to the brazilian portuguese translation would be much more significant if we had a streamlined contribution system, which pull requests on Github allow quite easily. What are the current problems of Git migration?
