>
> Do you mean something yucky like http://pecl.php.net/propro?
>
>
I don't know what that is, and there is no description on that page.


> It's actually been meant to be used by extensions for internal properties,
>> but it might do the evil you're looking for.
>
>
Would you care to elaborate? What is evil about the thing I've described?


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote:

> On 30 April 2013 01:45, Rasmus Schultz <ras...@mindplay.dk> wrote:
>
>> The characters was an arbitrary choice, just for the sake of argument.
>>
>> I'm not a C programmer, so I don't have a patch - there is also no RFC,
>> but
>> there is general interest, I'd be happy to write one.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Lars Strojny <l...@strojny.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Rasmus,
>> >
>> > Am 25.04.2013 um 14:47 schrieb Rasmus Schultz <ras...@mindplay.dk>:
>> > [...]
>> > >
>> > > What do you think?
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm not sure about the operator character but the general idea is a good
>> > one. Do you have a patch as a POC?
>>
>
> Do you mean something yucky like http://pecl.php.net/propro?
> It's actually been meant to be used by extensions for internal properties,
> but it might do the evil you're looking for.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mike
>

Reply via email to