Hello Nikita, 2013/2/25 Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com>
> Hi internals! > > PHP 5.4 added support for expressions of the kind (new Foo)->bar(), (new > Foo)->bar and (new Foo)['bar']. > > I guess it must have been discussed, but Is there any technical reason or conflict that prevents us from having something like new Foo->bar(), without the extra parenthesis? > I'd like to extend this support to any expression instead of just new. > > Why should be do this? Because it's just an arbitrary restriction. Removing > it would for example allow clone calls in the parens, so you could do > something like (clone $date)->modify('...'). Which - you may have already > noticed this - is more or less a replacement for the DateTimeImmutable > class that was added for 5.5 (with the nice benefit of being fully > compatible and not being an object oriented abomination :) That's just one > example, but I think there are a lot more (especially if you also consider > that it allows array dereferencing too). One further use that is of > interest to me personally is for https://github.com/nikic/scalar_objects, > so I can do calls like ("foo")->bar(). > > A nice side benefit from this is that it removes a shift/reduce conflict > from the parser. > > The patch for the change can be found here: > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/291/files. It's a very simple patch, > it > basically just changes one parser rule and adjusts the allowed opp types > for some opcodes. The rest is just the vm regeneration for the new op > types. > > I hope that this change is trivial enough to not require dragging it > through the whole RFC process. If there are no objections I'd commit it > sometime soon. > > Thoughts? > Nikita > Lazare INEPOLOGLOU Ingénieur Logiciel