Sara, I wasnt commenting that this RFC was different, just in agreement that this syntax is _more_ in line with the list() construct (which then might reflect the skipparams rfc)) If i wasnt clear: from a user point of view: i am all for this RFC ;)
Met vriendelijke groet, Robin Speekenbrink Kingsquare BV 2013/2/19 Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Kingsquare.nl - Robin Speekenbrink > <ro...@kingsquare.nl> wrote: > > Just a question from one of the lingering listeners: would this change > also > > ease the `skipping` of default values for parameters? (as discussed for > RFC > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/skipparams) > > > > That way it would be consistent with this RFC and the list() construct ? > > > It's orthogonal to skipparams. It'd neither help nor hurt based on > the recommendations of that RFC. > > With regard to list(), it already supports expressions like this: > list($x,) = array(123); so nothing more needs to be done for it and > it's not at odds with either of these RFCs. > > -Sara >
