On Feb 18, 2013, at 23:03 , Christopher Jones <christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > On 02/18/2013 10:52 AM, Christopher Jones wrote: > >> I agree that unless we get Gopal-like inspiration (inclued, scream) for >> naming, "opcache" is best. > > In the "so bad I can't resist sending it" category is today's > semi-humorous name suggestion: "Cajun". It sounds roughly like the > English pronunciation of "caching" > > Sadly it's not as nicely self-documenting as "opcache". > opcache is fine, its better that it's self describing then exiting. <not:to-be-taken-seriusly> Cause then you don't have to google it to figure out what it is every time, like T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM :P So if you really have to make a name for it, keep it self describing, like: OpsiCache Other then already being a used name, ops(i) is the word you would say in some languages when you realize you have done a mistake :) </not:to-be-taken-seriusly> -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
