Hi David, thanks for the clarification, sounds like a plan :-) I'm not opposed to including O+, quite the opposite but I want us to stick to our process.
cu, Lars Am 15.02.2013 um 19:14 schrieb David Soria Parra <dso...@gmx.net>: [...] >> I'm sorry, but you must be kidding doing such a change and skipping >> the RFC process altogether. This will seriously hurt the acceptance >> of the whole RFC process and there won’t be a good argument against >> people just committing random changes without an RFC. How should I >> convince somebody with a working pull request to go ahead and deal >> with an RFC when we introduce changes like that "just like that". >> >> Can we please stop the process insanity and stick to our own rules >> (or change them in a transparent way). >> >> Thanks, Lars >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRHnsjAAoJEKSanlo0ToXKmXAP/AuKTYfcm3PZdrOu9nqDkg8x > IjnsY5pMybDTbkJtLw96DT+5Zz24t9BdwBPwTRkKccLiYGavCQvV+ewdNUMEFrv7 > kbuyi6tgRbB/aUpocKXbzq5CRk19YcIZr3E4HXpeMHcNhXGbFRmXvk8yMUWlTGMn > Fsf6v9bs+4d/uCaSMr2jS56KgDTn9pseAbeDumj3L+EAZYF+k/lz0YuxNC7X3EUv > HclKiPBLroaYz0q4Yg+BHuBsCgkhGnzwxNlYfkCPHh8mZZFxUtcIkONgILgxsGMA > +ik51JzspZRkdvr+TpvE6Va5O52i3C31wxKelr4f2+dgDO7v28tqOxrOHYVZgpdY > NK3GOYDgp1YgphY0CY/J0IrK2yLjdqois7qynuyAwP7DxE/ytz6HFs4UuzPdM6Ry > sFXua/L5JFzHHO4jU1x47BDM/Blre2COQaMdB1GE2hgFIjKqU5cQRHxMG6VzGCct > UiWik8/1sLQKoMFQnSMBHbidlYbDCKd4kW2dyKjKw9Ok3MfW08VPZ/SBJNB2RDYP > aYD4OcVe9SE9kuJEP0sxs9f/s4xMmkiP6AYa/2e2L4UqfoT0bo20HrrA50h0lKXb > hkj/yOWB9f6qy3qUhDK5EdbSPK5i18cS5jWcseXLjHlE/xADWGrTyjAg2flaKAQT > xF5/opO8pfoi4PY6osQT > =iZJN > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
