> > Based on an 18 month release cycle, and assuming we release 5.5.0 in > > mid 2013, 5.6.0 will come out late 2014. > > I wonder where you pick those quantifications from, according to > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess there is 12 month cycle/tact, and > according to the release date of PHP > 5.4 major releases (golden) are scheduled for the first of march each year > (alphas accordingly earlier).
I'm taking it from both reality and the discussions we had surrounding the release process RFC (in short, the 'yearly' in there was subject to change without notice; It's not an 11th commandment). I see good reasons not to go with a yearly release cycle, considering there's next to nobody actually interested in consuming those releases, but that's another story. > >> > * Which benefits does Zend Inc. see in contributing the Opcode > >> cache? > > > > Simply put, this could benefit PHP greatly without negatively > > affecting our business in any way. > > And not simply put? Complexly put, this could benefit PHP greatly without negatively affecting our business in any way. I don't intend to become argumentative. You're obviously entitled to your opinion and I think that there's nothing I could say that would change it. Zeev -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
