Am 04.02.2013, 19:11 Uhr, schrieb Terry Ellison <te...@ellisons.org.uk>:
Hi Terry and all
thank you very much for your response.
The only thing that confused me about what you say that the second
*doesn't* grow
Yes, about that i was [and am still :-)] also confused... why the 2nd
one won't grow *non-stop*
so I checked and it does -- just the same as the first.
Right, it grows, but not non-stop as in the 1st one.
The memory will stop growing (on my machine) at ~2491584 bytes and the
loop is able to run forever,
creating each eval() furthermore uniqe ano-function's but not
endless-filling Zend-internal tables.
but this still leaves the function record itself in the
function_table hash so with a non-zero reference count and this
doesn't get DTORed until request shutdown
Not familar with the Zend-internals but just about so i was imaging
and expecting it.
That why i [still] also confused/wondering why in the 2nd example the
memory will not grow *endless*.
It seems that the function records in the function_table will be
DTORed (or similar cleaned up) before request-shutdown at some point...
Could this be the case?
OK, Hans-Jürgen, this one has got me interested. I am developing a fork
of APC optimized for cgi and cli use -- but that's a different topic --
though understanding the DTOR processes for compiler objects interests
me because of this. I'll go through the code and especially for Closure
objects to understand why. However thinking through this logically:
1. The fact that the second does stop growing means that that the
reassignment of the global $ano sets the RC of the previous closure
object to zero triggering DTOR of the lamba function.
2. There is something pathological about the first case which is
frustrating garbage collection on the lambda function DTOR.
I replaced your inner loop by:
$len = $argv[1] & 1 ? $argv[2] : mt_rand(1, $argv[2]);
$str = "'." . bin2hex(fread($fp, $len)) . "'";
if ($argv[1] & 2) $str = "function() {\$y = $str; };";
eval ("\$x = $str;");
echo "Mem usage: ".memory_get_usage()."\n";
to allow me to use arg1 to select one of the four test cases 0..3 and
arg2 is the (max) string size, n say. This clearly shows the fact that
the memory explosion only occurs if the string is allocated *inside* the
lambda function.
4. If you substitute n<15 then memory growth rapidly stabilises for PHP
5.3.17 0, but still explodes for n>14
5. In the case of PHP 5.4.6 a similar effect occurs except that
explosion occurs at n>11.
6. The fact that 5.3 and 5.4 are different is notable -- however, the
fact that 5.4 is still (eventually) stable for n<12 means that this
isn't a string interning issue.
Interesting. Merits more research :-)
Hi Terry
i made similar tests with similar results.
Currently, in my script, i'm just padding the function-body with additional
spaces enough to ensure having always a fixed length to avoid endless-memory
growing.
But with non-good feeling because i'm still not sure what is going on
internaly... and my knowledge about the php/zend internals is poor :-)
So i'm very glad getting your interest in this issue.
Logical thinking... since the memory-growing depends "only" on variable length
of the function-body (and not of the content it self) i could imaging that
it is possible to get the php/zend internals to also with variable lengths of
the function-body... seems not far away.
But as i said... my knowledge ends at this point but i'm very interessted about
your results, if you research it further more.
Thank you again
Greetings
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
