Seeing as it doesn't break BC, and could be quite useful I don't see why you shouldn't merge it.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Gustavo Lopes <glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt>wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:23:59 +0100, Gustavo Lopes <glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt> > wrote: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**sendrecvmsg<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sendrecvmsg> >> >> The module ext/sockets, a wrapper around the sockets API, does not >> include support to recvmsg() and sendmsg(). This RFC addresses this >> shortcoming by support introducing limited (only a few types of messages >> are supported) support for these functions. >> >> > Since no one has commented and the feature freeze for 5.5 is getting near, > I'm just going to assume lazy consensus and merge this in once I get it to > build on Windows. > > So if you do have any objection (procedural or substantial), please raise > it soon. > > -- > Gustavo Lopes > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- *Brandon Wamboldt* Software Engineer Resume/CV <http://brandonwamboldt.com/cv/> - Personal Site/Blog<http://brandonwamboldt.ca/> - LinkedIn <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brandonwamboldt> - StackOverflow Careers Profile <http://careers.stackoverflow.com/brandonwamboldt> - GitHub Profile <https://github.com/brandonwamboldt>
