On 2013-01-28, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote:
> --e89a8fb1fbd85c066a04d455d2d7
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> The specific case in point is
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2 - which while has more
> supporters than opposers, consistent fell short of the 2/3 majority it
> needs to be approved.  The vote should have ended on Wednesday =E2=80=93 4 =
> days
> ago, but for some reason it=E2=80=99s still open.  It=E2=80=99s time to clo=
> se it.

I agree. We need a defined period for voting. The past RFCs have seen
very short voting periods to very long, depending on what the RFC creator
wanted and usually worked in his favor. To make it more objectiv and
actually concentrate on code instead of votings I tihnk a 1 week or 2
week period after calling for votes is okay and shouldn't be able to
be extended.

Concerning the property syntax, I agree that this vote should be closed
already.

David


-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to