Alexander, So, I take the original class, rename it and then create a decorator > class instead of original class with overridden dynamic and static > methods. Method in the decorator should make some specific logic and > then just invokes the original static method with Reflection, but the > scope should be also correct. >
I have to ask: *why*? Why are you using static methods like that? It seems to me that you're trying to use LSB to introduce a form of polymorphism where it's not really designed for it... Why not just use instances in this case (which are supported for your use-case)...? Anthony
