Scott, > I did review these, and I like them, but I think they should be added > separately, especially since they deal more with objects than arrays. > > As long as the work with objects that implement ArrayAccess then it should > be fine? >
For consistency sake, I would recommend that it does not work with objects (even that implement ArrayAccess). Right now, the array extension (the 76+ array functions) don't accept ArrayAccess classes, so this should be no different IMHO... Anthony
