On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Thomas Hruska <thru...@cubiclesoft.com>wrote:
> [...]
>
> The array_map() changes would allow for multiple arrays of values:
>
> array_map($keys, $vals, $vals2, $vals3);
>
[...]
>
> But it would execute faster if it were supported in array_map(). If it is
> supported in array_map(), then array_combine() could call array_map() and
> could potentially just be an alias to array_map().
>
>
Alternatively, array_combine() could be made variadic, adding your proposed
behavior (which is more in line with the current behavior of
array_combine() than array_map()).
Speaking of,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Thomas Hruska <thru...@cubiclesoft.com>
wrote:
> [...]
>
> In addition, passing multiple value arrays would do something naturally in
> line with the rest of how array_map() works now but with keys sourced from
> the keys array.
>
Just to be clear, do you mean the result would be:
array($keys[0] => array($vals0[0], $vals1[0], ...),
$keys[1] => array($vals0[1], $vals1[1], ...),
...)
so the i-th item in the result would be an array with the i-th items of
each value array, and the i-th item of the key array as the key?
