On 21 November 2012 13:03, David Muir <davidkm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21/11/12 15:47, Adam Harvey wrote: >> 2. If we decide not to generate E_DEPRECATED notices in PHP 5.5, what >> should the next course of action be: >> (a) Enhance the manual text to make the soft deprecation clearer, >> and generate E_DEPRECATED notices in PHP 5.6 >> (b) Enhance the manual text to make the soft deprecation clearer, >> but take no further action in terms of E_DEPRECATED for the forseeable >> future >> (c) Remove the warnings from the manual and undeprecate ext/mysql >> entirely > > Has 2(c) been even suggested?
Not that I've seen, but having a "none of the above, I want none of this" option seems prudent. > I take at that 2(b) is for those advocating "Move to PECL with no > E_DEPRECATED notices being thrown"? Not really. We can't really unbundle and move to PECL without deprecating first anyway, IMO. It's basically the option for no real change but clarifying the manual wording, since nobody seems satisfied with it. Or, to put it another way from where I sit: the "too hard, let's make a decision after stringing people along longer" option. Adam -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
