Le 26/10/2012 11:37, Clint Priest a écrit :
I'm opening up several new threads to get discussion going on the
remaining "being debated" categories referenced in this 1.1 -> 1.2
change spec:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented/change-requests
In the RFC, section "read-only / write-only keywords" :
class TimePeriod{
private $Seconds;
public $Hours {
get() { return $this->Hours; }
private final set($value) { throw new Exception("Setting
of TimePeriod::$Hours is not allowed."); }
isset() { return isset($this->Seconds); }
unset() { unset($this->Seconds); }
}
}
I just added the methods "isset" and "unset" of the first example.
So, is there a case where "set" and "unset" shouldn't have the same
visibility ? And "get" and "isset"?
If not, the Amaury's proposition could be merged in your syntax:
class TimePeriod{
private $Seconds;
public:private $Hours {
get() { return $this->Hours; } // read => public
set($value) { throw new Exception("Setting of
TimePeriod::$Hours is not allowed."); } // write => private
isset() { return isset($this->Seconds); } // read => public
unset() { unset($this->Seconds); } // write => private
}
}
