I apologize for my confusing terminology - let me elaborate. There are no
special syntaxes. The below code should help clear things up a bit:
class MyClass {
> private $otherProperty;
> public $property {
> get() {}; // Does not "have a body", as there is no code between the
> curly braces.
> set($value) { $this->otherProperty = $value; } // Does "have a body",
> as there IS code between the curly braces.
> }
> }
>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Stas, the proposed "solution" thus far is to make the getter or setter
> > final and private and not have a body. This would naturally throw an
> > exception if it was accessed from anywhere but the class it was defined.
> > The class it was defined in has to remember that it is virtually a
> > read/write only accessor.
>
> What you mean by "not have a body" - is there special syntax for
> body-less methods introduced? Then it should be in the RFC. How it is
> implemented - what exactly is stored in the function table then?
>
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>
