On 09/03/2012 04:31 PM, Alex Aulbach wrote: > 2012/9/4 Gustavo Lopes <glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt>: >>> Following this logic, we'd have to convert all E_NOTICE and E_STRICT to >>> fatal errors or exceptions - they are usually produced by programming >>> errors and aren't meant to be caught by surrounding code (actually, >>> can't). But I don't see anybody benefiting from this - as I don't see >>> anybody benefiting from generator that will explode your application if >>> you touch it twice. > > Nobody is forced to handle an notice-exception like a fatal exception. > A notice-exception can be created write something into an error-log > and tells PHP not to handle it any more (destroys itself). Could be > all done in the construction of the exception. >
First, you got the quoting wrong. Please be more careful with that. And second, huh? Uncaught exceptions are by definition fatal. There is no such thing as a notice exception. If we go down that road refer to my email describing condition error systems. Longer term I think a condition system would make a lot of sense for PHP, but we definitely don't want to introduce some sort of bastard non-fatal exception. -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
