Yes that is a very common use case and autoloading functions would
solve that one but my main aim here is readability. And that said I
would also suggest:

  use function Namespaced\foo;

  foo(); // calls Namespaced\foo();

;-)

--
Giedrius Dubinskas

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Sebastian Krebs <krebs....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> because it fits into the context (even if it's slightly offtopic): Can I
> throw in, that I would like to see autoloading for functions? :)
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/8/15 Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com>
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Giedrius Dubinskas
>> <d.giedr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello Internals!
>> >
>> > I'm just on and off luker here but thought I'll throw in an idea for a
>> > feature I'd love to see in PHP: aliasing static methods.
>> >
>> > Syntax would look something like this:
>> >
>> >   use Namespaced\SomeClass::staticMethod;
>> >   use Some\Foo::bar as fooBar;
>> >
>> >   staticMethod(); // would call Namespaced\SomeClass::staticMethod()
>> >   fooBar(); // would call Some\Foo::bar()
>> >
>> > This would make code more readable, by removing the the noise of
>> > repetition of class names. For use cases we can look at Java use cases
>> > for "import static".
>> >
>> > Aliasing class constants like that would also be very nice.
>> >
>> > What does everyone think?
>>
>> I have the suspicion that you are just using static methods as a way
>> to group functions into a "namespace". If that's what you want, then
>> why not just use namespaced functions for that? Should be a lot less
>> confusing and also semantically more correct.
>>
>> Nikita
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to