2012/7/24 Andrew Faulds <a...@ajf.me>: > Much easier to make an iterator with a function than as a class.
2012/7/24 Yahav Gindi Bar <g.b.ya...@gmail.com>: > I agree, implementing a class only for iterator may be pain sometimes, and > functions is much better - especially when 5.3 got the anonymous functions, > so we can even use the generators for iterator functions in class methods > which can be great. Ok, why not call it "iterator" or "generator" or "huffpuff" instead of "function"? It's just the naming, which disturbs me, because a function is something which is, when called once finished once. I don't like mathematics, but that is one of the definition of a function: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_%28mathematics%29 "each input is related to exactly one output" Couldn't be so complicated to introduce a new name for that, or? -- Alex Aulbach -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
