>     1.01 eq 1.1

Could you explain this one to me?  In every versioning system I've ever
used, 1.1 would be greater than 1.01, not equal.

> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com
>wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > >> For example, I was not the only one who found it odd that "1.0" is
> > >> considered less than "1.0.0" - wouldn't it make sense to "pad" the
> > shortest
> > >> version-number with zeroes? e.g. "1.0" if compared against "1.0.0"
> > would be
> > >> padded with zeroes at the end, e.g. as "1.0.0".
> >
> > 1.0.0 and 1.0 are different things. If you want to make a comparison
> > that takes into account only two components, you can just cut them both
> > to two components, then compare.
> > --
> > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> > (408)454-6900 ext. 227
> >

Reply via email to