Anthony, the whole concept is interesting. Can you probably write that as RFC. I believe that will make it easier to read/understand it.
Right now, I have only one question: On 20.07.2012, at 4:33, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > The benefit here, is that user types can implement the same "core" interface > and be used polymorphically with the core types (for at least the base API). > So then, countable() would disappear. what is this "core" interface? something magically assumed for internal types but explicitly defined as interface for user classes? or implicit case-by-case interface like in python?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
