Obviously. This is simply the means to provide the new API without breaking BC. If people think this is acceptable then sure, let's plan an API. On Jul 18, 2012 5:54 PM, "Stas Malyshev" <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > > Er, sorry, accidental capslock. This IS a new API. That was an example. > > I'm not saying just put -> everywhere, I'm saying we can keep array_* > > and add a new set of -> functions which are well-designed, consistent, > etc. > > What "this"? So far I didn't see any single message discussing anything > about any API. All I see is discussing how we should have -> syntax > working on arrays and strings. IMO this is exactly the wrong place to > start, if your goal is to improve the API (if your goal is to have > "sexy" syntax, it's fine but then I do not see this goal as worthy). The > right place to start would be the API. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 >
