On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The recent > http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg59301.html > > discussion > > made me wonder why did we decide not supporting the final keywords for > > properties as it would provide an easy way for read-only attributes > (const > > would be a better choice in performance wise, but then you can only set > it > > in your declaration where no dynamic expression is allowed.) > > Final and readonly are too totally different concepts. > except in those programming languages, where declaring attributes as final does the same thing. > > Read only properties can be implemented by doing something using the > nice getter/setter RFC > (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented). > > thats true, maybe we should drop this thread until that RFC gets voted on. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
