Uhm... &= On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Paul Dragoonis <dragoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > My input is that we should be focusing on features that PHP lacks, or > fixing bugs rather than adding more sugar syntax just for the sake of > adding it. > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Pierrick Charron <pierr...@webstart.fr>wrote: > >> No problem when you'll come in Montreal ! If you need any help don't >> hesitate. >> >> Pierrick >> >> On 29 June 2012 14:27, Amaury Bouchard <ama...@amaury.net> wrote: >> >> > Yes, guys. I totally understand your point. As I said, I had this idea in >> > a dreamed context (good or bad dream? I don't know). >> > But still, I think it's intellectually interesting, even if it's not a >> > good concept for PHP. :-) >> > >> > Pierrick, I owe you a beer ;-) >> > Le 29 juin 2012 19:06, "Pierrick Charron" <pierr...@webstart.fr> a >> écrit : >> > >>
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
