On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:56:23 +0200, Nikita Popov
<nikita....@googlemail.com> wrote:
I just closed the vote for this RFC. The result (see
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/empty_isset_exprs#vote) is:
* Both empty() and isset(): 3
* Only empty(): 13
* None: 4
I'm not exactly sure what the policy for votes with three options is,
but given that the large majority voted for "Only empty()", I'll
assume that that's the accepted option.
The rule is that "a feature affecting the language itself (new syntax for
example) will be considered as 'accepted' if it wins a 2/3 of the votes".
13 votes in 20 is not 2/3 of the votes. So the question is whether any of
the persons that voted for "both empty() and isset()" prefers "only
empty()" to "none.
--
Gustavo Lopes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
