On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> wrote:
> Please review the section titled "Inclusion of Mixed Code," which > contains the quoted conversation I referred to, with commentary about > "bad, lazy" architecture that is currently standard in numerous > frameworks. I understand that you feel that in future such frameworks > will make a different set of choices, but it still doesn't make sense > to import that old thread of argument into your RFC directly. I think > you mean to present the diagram only, with a more dispassionate > explanation of its purpose. Ahh ok, yeah I think I pretty much just left that section as-is. I'll go ahead and fix that. --Kris
