hi, On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Philip Olson <phi...@roshambo.org> wrote:
> 1. Those with SVN [sic] access (but how does karma come into play?) It does, or we begin to have 2nd, 3rd and totally irrelevant classes of developers or doc writers. > 2. Those without (how do we provide such rights? to whom?) See my other reply, easy, simple, harmless. > I suspect most people voted "Yes" for that RFC thinking it'd mean less noise > on this list while not caring about the details. That's only a guess. But > trouble is, defining the "Who" is the most difficult part and a big reason why > general consensus is preferred. I prefer not to comment on that part. It is like saying that people are not able to take a qualified decision, for whatever reasons. I have been myself tempted to think or say the same about some of the php.net members, and have been proven wrong many times. So let ignore this comment. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
