The author of an RFC does need to respond to concerns raised (although possibly not the same concerns over and over).
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote: > On 04/17/2012 11:41 AM, Kris Craig wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com >> <mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com>> wrote: >> >> Number of posts to internals since Jan.1,2012 (top 15): >> >> [kris.cr...@gmail.com <mailto:kris.cr...@gmail.com>] => 249 >> >> >> Wooot! What's my prize? ;P >> >> Now I just need to start getting some commits in there.... > > Kris, this was actually the point of that email. You are extremely busy > on this list and while I appreciate the enthusiasm, it would be good if > you could try to refrain from commenting on every single thread multiple > times every day. Let it sit for a while, see what everyone has to say > and write a single message with your thoughts. > > This list is mainly for the people working on the code. Many of us are > simply deleting entire threads unread at this point which isn't a > healthy habit to get into. > > One idea for everyone on the list is a kind of self-imposed list posting > quota. For every commit, bug comment, doc contribution, infrastructure > contribution you make you get a post to the list. > > -Rasmus > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Tom Boutell P'unk Avenue 215 755 1330 punkave.com window.punkave.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
