Hi! > May I suggest using foo::__CLASS__ instead of foo::class ? It's longer, but > closer to what already exists for this semantic (class name as string), > don't you think ?
I like this. __CLASS__ is already being used as class name, and little chance of colliding with some code since you're not supposed to be using __ prefix in your names. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
