Hi, 2012/4/13 Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net>: > Hi, > > 2012/4/13 Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>: >> Hi! >> >>> If I exclude current code, then introducing script only include will be >>> preferred one. I preferred dedicated statement for it though. >>> >>> include >>> include_once >>> require >>> require_once >>> script >>> script_once >> >> I have a thought here. To implement script/script_once you don't need it >> to be a language construct. A function would do just as fine. Why not >> make an extension having these two functions, put it on PECL and see if >> people will be using it? >> For extreme adopters, you could even make php.ini switch that overrides >> include/require and redirects them to your script functions. Shouldn't >> be impossible to do, I think. > > Good idea. > > I think it's possible as a Zend engine module. It may be possible > as normal module if compiler hook can be used. I guess it is now. > > It provides optional security by accident. (Someone called LFI syntax > error an accident and I like it) I wish the other RFC author > implement this. > > Regards,
I just briefly read tokenizer code. We can simply scan tokens and validate then executes. So it's a very simple module to write. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
