On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > Err isn't this something that should go through the RFC process first?
> > I think it's a good idea and I'll probably vote for it, but as I
> > understand the RFC process was created specifically for stuff like this.
>
> One doesn't preclude the other. Pull is code, RFC is discussion, they
> can go in parallel.
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>

Well, technically it's discussion *and* vote.  I know we've been wanting to
get out of the habit of "push first, ask later," which is precisely what
RFC helps us avoid.  Personally, I think any commits for a non-minor change
(i.e. a new feature) should be branched and left unmerged until it passes
through the RFC voting process.  I'm a big fan of consistency over ad hoc
processes.  ;)

--Kris

Reply via email to