On 2012-03-19, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > --f46d043892b5b345eb04bb9cfe02 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hey Chris, > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Christopher Jones < > christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote: > I sense your hostility but I think you misunderstood my question. The > workflow page currently recommends the "git:" one for cloning (which > doesn't work for me, either). I think it should be changed to "https://";, > and I fully intend on making the change myself but first I wanted to ask > here to make sure there wasn't a reason why they went with "git:" instead > (i.e. I don't want to step on anybody's toes).
git:// is recommended when you can use it. The access is limited due to port limiations, but the protocl itself is superior to https for the purpose. http is a fallback when you cannot use ssh (developers only) or git -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
