Yeah your argument makes sense. The lack of process still makes me uneasy, but you shouldn't take that too seriously. I just tend to be very neurotic about this sorta thing. So don't let my apprehensive face-twitching about it bother ya too much lol. =)
--Kris 2012/3/3 Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de> > On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 16:19 -0800, Kris Craig wrote: > > Hmm yeah that's a good point. I guess the RFC would be to document what > > the procedure is; and, if there's not a procedure, then to establish one > > for consistency. I'm all for meritocracy for OOP project admins but if > > there's no established "process" for determining who goes into that inner > > circle I just don't think that's healthy IMHO. > > > > Either way, if there is a process for selecting them, somebody else will > > need to document it on the wiki because I have no idea what it is or if > it > > even exists. > > There is no big "selection" it's more like a "who doesn't run away" > there's no real "decision power" or anything in these tasks, purely > administrative tasks. If the current admins are to slow and somebody > trustworthy comes along and pushes them he gets access to the button. If > all those accounts are approved fast enough there's no need .. and once > there is need an RFC process to follow hurts. > > johannes > > > --Kris > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Lol well personally I disagree. I was super-stoked when the RFC > process > > >> was introduced and I would LOVE to see us make more use of it! Not > only > > >> does it help get a clearer guage of vote totals, but it also forces > > >> proposals to be more explicit and well-thought-out IMHO. > > >> > > >> Of course that's only my opinion. If other people say they'd like to > see > > >> that too then I'll propose something, otherwise I'll just mutter > under my > > >> breath and leave it alone. ;P > > >> > > >> > > > the RFC process covers how do we introduce changes. > > > nothing to change here imo. > > > of course if you think that this info would be useful for others, feel > > > free to document it in the wiki. > > > > > > -- > > > Ferenc Kovács > > > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > > > > > >
