Any further thoughts on this? --Kris
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Johannes Agreed. That was one of the reasons I decided to make the > existing behavior (i.e. "-a") the default. > > I haven't independently confirmed that issue in APXS but I have heard it > mentioned before; I'll test it myself when I get home just to make sure, > since the APXS docs are a bit vague on this. > > Either way, I think so long as our documentation is clear and the existing > behavior is default then it shouldn't pose a problem. > > --Kris > > > 2012/2/20 Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de> > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:02 -0800, Kris Craig wrote: >> > Opening discussion on RFC pertaining to adding a new option to the >> > configure script with regard to how/whether APXS touches the httpd.conf >> > file. >> > >> > This is my first RFC post so please go easy on me if I screwed-up on >> > procedure in any way. =) >> > >> > >> > Here it is: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/apxs-loadmodule >> >> A bit history: >> >> The svn revision r192467 had this comment: >> >> - Changed -a to -A to prevent enabling PHP in httpd.conf automatically. >> # Most distributions use separate file in a conf.d/ directory to enable >> # PHP, using -a would add unnecessary line in the main httpd.conf and >> # causes a warning during startup. >> >> This was reverted in r194843 >> >> - Revert -a to -A change, bad idea: It disables EXISTING lines too! >> >> >> I think we should be careful there. >> >> johannes >> >> >
