These things often tend to move slowly. I'm bewildered that most Linux repos still use PHP 5.1.
The problem is, this patch has not yet gone through the QA wash cycle. That takes time. The only way to get it into 5.4.0, therefore, would be to delay it even further. I needn't remind anybody here that we're already a month late on that. Adding any more delays to fix anything other than critical bugs should be avoided in my opinion. --Kris On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Jones < christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 02/24/2012 11:57 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be >>> included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4 >>> doesn't even support the latest Apache". >>> >> >> Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :) If somebody expects PHP to >> have release version supporting new major version of Apache within >> days of the new release I feel his expectations need to be >> adjusted. I certainly wouldn't expect it. >> >> > I kinda think Apache 2.4 was under development a bit longer than three > days, so PHP could reasonably have been expected to know what was > coming. > > > There is a patch attached to > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?**id=61172<https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61172> >>> It needs review and wider testing. >>> >> >> I don't think it is a critical fix, so it's not for 5.4.0. For 5.4.1 >> we will consider it, >> > > I've no problems with the umpires decision. Hopefully this thread > will aid web-searchers in locating the patch. > > > and for trunk it can go in right now if somebody validates it. >> > > Chris > > -- > Email: christopher.jo...@oracle.com > Tel: +1 650 506 8630 > Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
