On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:23, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi Justin, > > I'm totally for that, has been asked it for years. > > Let see what other nicer status we need as wel :) > > Cheers, > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Justin Martin <frozenf...@php.net> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they are >> reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for documentation >> problems, where someone has misunderstood what the documentation says, or >> hasn't read the documentation thoroughly enough. >> >> I'd like to propose simply changing the term "bogus" to "not-bug". This >> would more politely and clearly indicate the nature of the way the bug is >> being closed, in addition to the comment that one ordinarily leaves. >> >> Those I've spoken to in php.doc agree. Any objections?
Big +1 from me as well. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
