Hi Pierre, This thread isn't related to ci.qa.php.net in any way, from your reply it seems that you think it does. Of course I could fetch the list of branches from svn, but I don't need the list of all branches, just the supported ones, and as I said, currently there is no way (not that I'm aware of) fetching this info programatically. So as I said, I'm using the qa.php.net api ( http://qa.php.net/api.php?type=qa-releases&format=json&only=dev_versions) for fetching the dev versions, but if we don't watch out for setting the config there correctly(or making the active branches available some other ways), then that will cause problems. Of course we can just hard code that info to bugsweb as it was before, but that would a step backward.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > we have that already as part of the rmtools. The only data missing is > the list of branches as json, which is a simple export of the list > avaible in svn. I will add it and that's it. > > The rest of the info, builds errors and co (like last available > revision) are already available as json data. > > Maybe it would be nice if you begin to realize that you are not alone > around here to work on that, and certainly since 2 weeks. > > Cheers, > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I mentioned this before, and I remembered yesterday when David updated > the > > README.RELEASE_PROCESS: > > http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=319009 : > > Currently bugs.php.net uses the qa.php.net api to decide which PHP > branch > > are active, so what version should be listed for the bugreports. > > As we didn't have any specific api listing the active branches, I guessed > > that the active branches will always have an active qa version. > > This assumption failed with the release of 5.3.7 when Johannes updated > the > > next qa version to be 5.3.8, but active => false > > > http://svn.php.net/viewvc/web/qa/trunk/include/release-qa.php?r1=314792&r2=315141 > > This made the 5.3 versions disappear from the version list at > bugs.php.net: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg52793.html > > (check the thread or at least my comments) > > As I mentioned there, always having an active qa release for the active > > branches should fix this issue (there is no need having a release, just > > having it active), something like this: > > 'X.Y.Z' => array( > > 'active' => true, > > 'snaps' => array( > > 'prefix' => 'phpX.Y-latest', > > 'baseurl' => 'http://snaps.php.net/', > > ), > > ), > > > > this seems to be suggested by philip also (I don't know his rationale): > > http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=316012 > > > > So we can either agree on this (and then I can revert > > > http://svn.php.net/viewvc/web/php-bugs/trunk/include/php_versions.php?r1=315166&r2=315165&pathrev=315166 > > ) > > and update the README.RELEASE_PROCESS to reflect this (adding the > upcoming > > version as active on each stable release and not > > adding/removing/inactivating it when we EOLing a branch/major.minor > version) > > > > I hope this clears up the situation. > > > > ps: having an api for getting the active branches would be still a > cleaner, > > more straightforward solution. > > that would be easy to implement ( returning an array in json from a > config > > file). > > > > -- > > Ferenc Kovács > > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > > > > > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
