On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 12:17 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> We do 2) already (while we are working on increasing the amount of
>> apps and frameworks being tested), as I was asking to revert this
>> patch between 5.3.7 and 5.3.8 back then pointing to our tests results
>> and numerous reports. The problem was not in the QA but in the
>> decision process. QA should have a kind of veto power in this case to
>> avoid arguing and still have BC breaks landing in stable releases.
>
> Well, 5.3.7 - 5.3.8 wasn't really the problem. That release was rushed
> to fix my crypt screwup. This should have been caught in the 5.3.6 -
> 5.3.7 testing which lasted much longer than the short window to 5.3.8.

Right, also reported back then with the same success ;)

Anyway, that's past, the BC break has been fixed and we are working to
get these apps&frameworks tests result as part of our release process
(symfony and doctrine are on the road, must see with zf if we can
share resources as they do it anyway internally).

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to