On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stefan also mentioned that he won't continue the development of > bytekit in it's current form, and if I remember correctly Pierre > suggested that if the package is abandoned by the original developer, > a new developer could take it over and bring it to pecl. > for suhosin, having a decent documentation is much needed, and as you > also mentioned, it's really "popular", albeit the Gentoo dropped the > suhosin patch recently, as the it doesn't apply cleanly anymore. > for the long term, I would like to see that we leave the past behind, > and the useful features should be incorporated in the core, this way > removing the need for suhosin in it's current form. As of now there is almost zero reason to actually use it. Most were arguing about blowfish or session safety (entropy src) which is now fully supported in core and even in a better form than in the extension. I'm still waiting for a list of the feature/addition we should introduce in core. I'm totally against to document suhosin in www.php.net or any related sites. This extension is not supported, nor it is part of our projects. Distros having a wrong definition of safety and enabling random extension is a real problem, making it somehow official won't improve the situation. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
