On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:15 -0400, Sean Coates wrote: > *BUMP* > > It would be really helpful if we could find consensus on this… I feel like > the RFC process is stalled until these questions are answered.
I'm not the one who decides this. My personal opinion is that the rules do not apply for RFCs older than the voting and releaseprocess RFC. When the RFC was written and proposed the voting RFC was not accepted and therefore you might have written the RFCs with the intention of following a different way to get it accepted. We cannot apply approved RFCs to older RFCs. This is similar to laws (although RFCs are not laws or anything like that at all). Long story short: you can go on with the RFC the way you want, you don't have to stick to the voting RFC, but I would rather recommend to do it anyway. I personally don't have a problem with not sending the RFC mail again to internals. Just my 50ct > S > > On 2011-06-27, at 9:06 PM, Sean Coates wrote: > >> The RFC was accepted. > > > > Ok; so is this "official" now, or does it need to be ratified somehow? > > > > If I clean up my RFC (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/objectarrayliterals) and put > > it to vote, are these now the rules that will be followed? > > > > Since I didn't use "[RFC]" in the original email to internals, do I need to > > start from the start? > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
