On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> 2011/6/23 Larry Garfield<larry@garfieldtech.**com<la...@garfieldtech.com> >>> >: >>> >>>> I'm sure there are other projects with a vested interest whose people >>>> don't >>>> >>>> know C well enough to engage in most conversations on this frequently >>>> busy >>>> list. So... would we get a say or not? :-) >>>> >>> >> You have a say - you did that right now on the list :) However, in a >> company there's a difference between company's customers, employees and >> management, and though PHP is a volunteer and rather informal project, I >> think there are some decisions that should be taken by people that have good >> understanding of all effects and consequences of it and that will actually >> be bound by it. That doesn't mean the opinion of others is not important - >> it is important, and we have the list exactly for discussing and hearing >> people's opinions. >> >> Current voting system allows 2 levels of vote - anybody can vote or only >> people with wiki account (which is roughly equal to php/pecl committer >> account, though not exactly) can vote. Depending on the question, we can use >> the appropriate voting mode or even have 2 votes in parallel - for core >> developers and broader community. >> > > anybody can register on the wiki, so I think you should clarify on that > part.
Again, not everybody can vote. It has been explained enough already. This is clear. There may be a config issue if a registered user can vote but that's fixable (as not being a svn authenticated user). -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
