Hi, 2011/6/5 Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>
> Hi! > > > Of course, I was just checking if it's what you guys are thinking first. >> > > Well, there was basically two ideas: > 1. Add filename length to streams and check inside streams > 2. Check inside argument parser > > Both have downsides: (1) does not capture cases when we don't use streams > (such as direct stat/touch/etc functions), (2) doesn't cover the case when > stream is manipulated through a string not coming directly from a function > argument (e.g. include, but may be other cases with extensions). So, > ideally, it'd be nice to have both - or something third that I didn't think > of - but any of them is better than nothing. > (1) seems to be easier and less disruptive, provided that we cover include > case separately and locate all functions that deal with filenames. > > Ok, I've committed in 5.4 and trunk the argument parser part. Now I need to fix some tests and try to found other places needing for related checks. Thanks. -- Regards, Felipe Pena
