On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 12:42 -0400, Pierre Joye wrote:
> +1, very good job!
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Felipe Pena <felipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Reading our bug tracker I noticed a good feature request [1] from 2009 which
> > points to an interesting feature that I think makes sense for us, since we
> > are now working with $f() using objects and strings, and the array('class',
> > 'method') is an old known for call_user_func()-like functions.
> >
> > So, I wrote a patch [2] that allow such behavior to be consistent with
> > arrays. See some examples:
> >
> > class Hello {
> > public function world($x) {
> > echo "Hello, $x\n"; return $this;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > $f = array('Hello','world');
> > var_dump($f('you'));
> >
> > $f = array(new Hello, 'foo');
> > $f();
> >
> > All such calls match with the call_user_func() behavior related to magic
> > methods, static & non-static methods.
> >
> > The array to be a valid callback should be a 2-element array, and it must be
> > for the first element object/string and for the second string only. (just
> > like our zend_is_callable() check and opcodes related to init call)
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > [1] - http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47160
> > [2] - http://felipe.ath.cx/diff/fr47160.diff
> > phpt: http://felipe.ath.cx/diff/fr47160.phpt
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Felipe Pena
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>
This is a very good idea.
--
Marcel Esser
VP/Engineering, CROSCON
Washington, D.C. Office
@: marcel.es...@croscon.com
office.us +1 (202) 470-6090
mobile.us +1 (202) 250-1988
mobile.de +49 (0)176 391 226 23
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
